Monday, May 18, 2020
Critique. This Critique Seeks To Provide Contextualisation
Critique This critique seeks to provide contextualisation for investigations into gendered representations in childrenââ¬â¢s literature, and the mechanisms that underpin their construction and reproduction. The key aim is to explore possible shifts within gender representation in childrenââ¬â¢s literature. Hamilton et al. (2006) argue that although there have been changes, over time, to gender representations, improvements have been mitigated by both the underrepresentation of female characters and a continued tendency to cast girls in ââ¬Å"passive roles, boys in active onesâ⬠(p. 758). It is important to note that whilst underrepresentation is an important facet of study in childrenââ¬â¢s literature, it will be excluded from this discussion as toâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦178). Representations are construction in text, thus have a constructive effect in shaping understandings of world, identity and gender (Sunderland, 2011, p. 5). Sunderland notes, and partially support s, claims that representations constructed by discourses that stress differences could play significantly into naturalising and legitimating traditional ideas of gender. Construction is not without criticism, particularly as there are multiple definitions of what constitutes constructionism. Similarly, meanings of key concepts are open to contest by theoretical approaches (Lehtonen, 2007, 11). For example, various theoretical approaches disagree on the ââ¬Ërole of the readerââ¬â¢ in construction as an ââ¬Ëactive negotiatorââ¬â¢ or ââ¬Ëpassive recipientââ¬â¢ (Stam, 2001, p. 294). Other criticism of construction, in relation to discourse, argues that it is stronger theoretically, but lacks empirical outcomes (Stam, 2001, p.294; Sunderland, 2004, p. 172). Sunderland does observe this. Her own clear and concise investigation on discourse allows her to explore and critique various theoretical approaches to gendered discourse. Throughout the book, Sunderland makes an argument for interdisciplinary approaches to gendered discourses arguing that each theoretical approach has something to offer that may support or strengthen the othersâ⠬⢠conclusions. Despite criticism, it is possible to conclude that discursive construction is useful to critique approaches to representation toShow MoreRelatedThe Sociology Of Health And Mental Illness3181 Words à |à 13 Pagesbe rooted in the Fruedo-Marxist ââ¬Ëmethodological individualismââ¬â¢ of critical theory (Rogers Pilgrim, 2010: 14), or even a broader constructionist critique of medical truth, it just as easily lends itself to a more limited historicist Libertarian reading: mental illness as socio-political deviance within an encroaching state (Sumner, 1994). Within this interface must be located the panoply of ââ¬Ëiconographicââ¬â¢ representation (Shorter, 1997: 273) within wider mass-culture: Sumner cites the example of
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.